The Canon EOS 40D camera is now my third digital SLR. After entry into the exciting photo with a Canon EOS 350D and modified with the EOS 400D (with whom have? Brigens both very satisfied) has now arrived with the EOS 40D EF-S 17-85mm IS USM kit.
I don? Chte here, even the technical specifications of the EOS 40D lift? Choose to ensure that all those who are interested to know Gen? Ge, but my Beweggr? Gamma transition NDE Canon EOS Canon EOS XXXD xxd Erl utern online?.
My change of 400D to 40D took place at the moment, and the new EOS 450D is already ERH? Was ltlich. Granted, the 450D has 2 megapixels more Aufl? Solution, but that is at stake when the t wegschmei kit lens? (Or simply buy a housing of the mouse) and a lens at the top, finally, can cost 2 times the Kamerageh? Uses.
The 450D is technically probably a great camera with which you can make, images of high quality and picture quality? The T 40D lacks nothing. However that is compact Go? Use the 450D on the manipulation f? R Gro normal? E M? Nnerh? Nde simply too small. I myself is also still in progress the battery on my 400D, treatment has improved significantly, but not that of a heranzureichen 40D (mind you, even without a grip) - simply awesome! A (f n)? HLT easily at home.
Incidentally, the Group has the same problem with Nikon D40/40x/60 than D80/200/300. Great pictures everyone, but only D80/200/300 is really good in hand.
This is particularly evident when the other (better to be screwed and heavier), as slow as the EF-S 18-55mm. Because of the size? E and the weight of the 40D you have the combination is always confident in hand (even in a pinch!). In 450D, everything tends to lean foreword and l? T keep only bottom-up methods? Tzung On the other hand on the lens safe and quiet.
Just a note to the kit EF-S 17-85 IS USM:
I think this is the goal, especially for the price of the kit and cash-back promotion at the time as "Immerdrauf Lens" is unsurpassed. Problems arise when? Berhaupt only in extreme wide angle. Making this minor, but the image stabilization and USM lead to new low competition. Ottica migliore, soprattutto luce Determinazione? Cost significantly more accurate. The Canon Image Stabilizer in the lens and not in the installation mice, I see that (the price), disadvantage.
First, it already contributes to stabilize the viewfinder image, the other price difference with the approach of first class, with without stabilizer stabilizer is almost nonexistent. Super lens f? At Sony, Olympus, Pentax and Co., there is, unfortunately, not given, even without a stabilizer.
And another thing: it hoods Versaut your goal is not cheap, but when? T in the sour apple and take the original Canon Geli hurts too is double the cost. Finishing and development are the best.
My conclusion: Both the Canon EOS 450D, and with the Canon 40D can gleicherma? Make the images excellent, but the Anfassqualit? "T" (handling and processing) is light years ahead of the 40D. And since the difference in price with the cash back is very low, eh? My favorite T-40D only.
www.digitalslrcameraprices.com
share on: facebook
0 comments:
Post a Comment