digital slr body First SLR ever owned, starting.

What can I say except that this camera is the best thing that happened to me, with my dear wife.

I came from point-n-shoot cameras, belonging to a large number of them, especially Sony and some even half the price of the SLR. I always had two big problems with point-n-shoot cameras. First, I always had to take pictures of 2.3 to get something decent out. It seemed that during the filming of the ways the very definition of color is always different in every photo. Secondly, it was a real challenge for me to capture moving objects, blurring out, sometimes it was necessary that I should use + 4.5 times to an acceptable result.

Instead, I decided to spend 900 Bux and get this camera. He simply refuses to break the image. I took pictures of the window of the bus in motion, I took pictures with fast moving objects, and just refuses to break the focus. I am very surprised to see how it behaves, even in automatic mode. E 'as almost like a dream.

The next thing you tried the macro mode of the botanical garden, and you can see some examples of films - the blue flower is one of the best:) I took about 5 photos of each flower, because that's how I used to do in the past. I should not have. Each picture was clear cut, however, since the purpose of the kit is not really a macro lens, when shooting flowers very small, there have been some Blurr, which is totally understandable. Some things are simply too small to capture the detail, with the goal of the kit, is not the fault of the camera.

Another interesting feature is the ability to update the firmware of the same, we all know that improves stability, adds new features, and, if necessary, correct the errors in the software.

The quality of construction is really solid. It feels rock solid, but not too heavy:)

Finally, the battery. I have not exhausted the battery, but I took about 230 photos, around 30 of them were in the dark with flash. At the end of the day, I was still running at full load. So while I can not say exactly how many shots u can get a full charge, I can confirm that the battery is not easily exhausted.

In general, if you have money to spend and I congratulate this new SLR camera. Of course it is a bit 'expensive, but the SDHC memory cards are cheap nowadays.

read more “digital slr body First SLR ever owned, starting.”
share on: facebook

digital slr body In search of a good NPC that will not break the bank? That's all.

I sold my beloved Nikon D70 digital slr body , after four years of use. I still miss. I bought a D40, but it is never a good feeling. The picture quality is good, better than the D70, but I had to go through menus to do almost everything (changing white balance, ISO, format the card, you choose), while D70 was dedicated buttons. What makes the difference in terms of usability. In addition, the D40, even with my beloved Autofocus 50 millimeters 1.8. Are you kidding? I returned the D40 after 3 days of use.

I lookind the D80, 40D, the D300, the XTI digital slr body, and this. All good cameras (at the end of the day, all the big photo shoot). And usability / sweet price / new features factor that count. 40D and D300 digital slr body are expensive for me (not professional). The digital slr body XTI is getting old (though still good, and the price very good). The D80 is very good, an elder brother of my beloved D70, but still old: no sensor cleaning, Highlight Tone priority, is not bundled with a lens VR. They actually buy a camera from 2006 to 2008. I do not like.

I found this XSI digital slr body at Circuit City. I felt good in hand soon. Had most of the buttons I need to make changing quickly. I still have been gaining access to a menu to select the white balance (the D70 digital slr body has a button for that). Same format the card (button combination on the D70 digital slr body). ISO car is not as smart as the implementation of Nikon digital slr body . In addition, the camera is excellent. All other buttons are there. It has a RGB histogram (very important because you can see from the cutting of individual colors). The picture quality is excellent. Very little noise (Canon's CMOS sensor is cleaner than the CCD of the Nikon D80 digital slr body), very good skin tone (which take many pictures of my daughter and my wife).

If the D80 digital slr body had the same features of 2008, as this (Highlight Tone Priority, self-cleaning sensor, including VR Lens), which have earned. Remains a great camera. This is just a 2008 camera with features found in semi-40D Pro and Pro 1DS.

I'm very happy with it.

read more “digital slr body In search of a good NPC that will not break the bank? That's all.”
share on: facebook

In search of a good NPC that will not break the bank? That's it.

I sold my beloved Nikon D70, after four years of use. I still miss. I bought a D40, but it never felt right. The picture quality is good, better than the D70, but I had to go through menus to do most everything (changing white balance, ISO, formatting the card, take your pick), while the buttons The D70 had dedicated. What makes the difference in terms of usability. Addition, the D40 does not even autofocus with my beloved 50 millimeters 1.8 lens. Are you kidding me? I returned the D40 after 3 days of use.

I lookind the D80, 40D, the D300, the XTI, and this. All good cameras (at the end of the day, all take excellent pictures). is the usability / sweet price / new features factor that counts. 40D and D300 are expensive for me (not pro). The XTI is getting old (still good though, and the price very good). The D80 is very good, an elder brother of my beloved D70, but still old: no sensor cleaning, Highlight Tone priority, it is bundled with a lens VR. You are actually buying a camera from 2006 to 2008. I do not like.

I found this XSI at Circuit City. She was just in my small hands. Had the most buttons I need to make changes quickly. I still have access to a menu to choose my white balance (the D70 has a button for that). Same format the card (button combination on the D70). Auto ISO is not as smart as the implementation of Nikon. Besides this, the camera is excellent. All other buttons are there. It has an RGB histogram (very important, which allows you to see if you are clipping individual colors). The picture quality is great. Very little noise (Canon's CMOS sensor is cleaner than the CCD Nikon D80), very nice skin tones (I take lots of photos of my daughter and my wife).

If the D80 has the same characteristics as this 2008 (Highlight Tone Priority, self-cleaning sensor, bundled VR lens), I would have won that. It 'still a great camera. This is just a 2008 camera with features found in semi-40D Pro and Pro 1DS.

I am very satisfied.

read more “In search of a good NPC that will not break the bank? That's it.”
share on: facebook

digital slr body Shining out of the box, and then continues to improve

Since I got my D5000 3 weeks ago, I took, pictures of the horse trials, a festival of music and a 2-week holiday in Scotland to photograph wildlife and landscapes. It took about 800 photos and family with your ability to get am. I have the 18-55 and 55-200 lenses, polarizing filters and a sky. I found the box that takes, pictures of large cars in which most of his thinking for you, but changing the JPEG settings may cause the results will be even better. The horse because of evidence that the car at all because of the speed that thing happen in these events, and he had just handed over the camera. The music festival took a good result in low light conditions, with a shutter speed to set the ASA 3200 is recorded. The festival was where I could take my time, but playing with the camera and learn to use its feature set, including a very long exposure (eg, waterfalls and sunsets), shutter speed (fauna wild) and aperture priority (landscape, wildlife and flowers). Compare to its main rival, the Canon 500, LCD Monitor D5000 procrastination and I like how the Canon is at hand - the Nikon feels the little 'bulky. However, after that, at this price, I think the Nikon starts to leave behind Canon. The kit lens are better built and better performance in low light is excellent and the LCD screen rotates and tilts (which allowed me to take a picture of a deer in the territory - I n "I could not get this under of a fee without lying in the mud.) Movies are a bit 'uneasy with both, but I'm happy with the quality of film Nikon. I wanted an entry for external microphone, the microphone is silly, but not a camera at this price with this installation. I came to love the D5000, but I knew my way around I think this is the best for all at this price. The Olympus 640 is good, as the Panasonic, but the film. The charge is potentially better if you spend a lot of money on lenses. However you have the kind of money to buy expensive lenses would probably be better to buy a better body than the 500.

About 600 pounds, I think that the Nikon has a clear advantage over its competitors for what they want from a camera - good car, good targets, versatility and movies. However if you think it is a bit 'bulky, perhaps, while the Panasonic is for you, or Olympus. If you want a big screen, and the intention of spending too much money for the lenses in the future, the costs could be the one for you. I doubt any of them will be eliminated, but for me the Nikon does.

www.digitalslrcameraprices.com

read more “digital slr body Shining out of the box, and then continues to improve”
share on: facebook

Canon EOS 500D Digital SLR Camera (15 megapixels, LiveView, HD video) BODY

Finally, all in one device

I took the Canon EOS 500D just over two weeks, at which time about 800 pictures and movies. Now is the time to draw conclusions.

Until now I have a Canon EOS 30D (and still do! Taken) and an old EOS 20D. Now you have the soft-500D (yes, I like both cameras use one with a wide angle, the other) with a telephoto lens.

The Canon EOS 500D in many respects a great advance in other ways, at least a small improvement.

The picture quality is generally very good, as I expected from a Canon EOS. The noise at ISO 100, it is not practical, even ISO 200 is too eigenlich. At 400 ISO, however, we found a deterioration of image quality, but what makes image editing more Get A Grip. ISO800 is compared with the Canon EOS age of at least the same in terms of noise. This is true even at high ISO values. The 500D offers ISO12800 legendary. ISO6400 is - if not increased much in the picture - the 15MP APS-C chip very well, as he ISO12800 fast, the screen size is very good, sound wise to be so good Get a grip.
After all, it is now possible, the extreme sensitivity of the recording to almost complete darkness. It extends from the light just to name a few. It is recommended that in case of doubt, overexpose anything, because the pressure is on the computer is not recommended because of the noise is very old.
That would surely be more likely to buy the 5D MKII - which, of course, much more expensive.

JPEG images directly from the camera are certainly very useful. To clarify Tonwertpriorität and automatically (Auto Light Optimizer) Nachberarbeitung is not usually necessary. In larger devices, I often brilliant images Füllicht Resort - savings here now. However, it is very relaxing, not previously re-process the images. With a visual acuity of 4-5, the images are very "crunchy".

Of course, you can also use RAW. However, each image with 18-27MB seems book. Here we use a memory card is big enough. RAW offers more flexibility for Nachberarbeitung - but not necessarily for more details.

In direct comparison with the 30D, I must say, however, makes the 500D image quality is far better, at least not in the area of ISO1600. I only see advantages in increased sensitivity and better JPEG images directly from the device (in this case, the 30D is not as good, and RAW) has many advantages.
The advantages of 14 bits, praised the Canon, which I found, even with the 500D. Neither they nor a better position, in those who have shown a greater degree of absorption, as the happy.

For the 500D, you need good lenses. The 18-55mm IS actually responsible for the various steps quite well, but I was a little 'disappointed with the 500D. With 17-40mm long run, however, I had better results. The 70-300mm IS USM cut the 500D excellent.

It was in Betracht gezogen werden sollte: die 15MP APS-C Chip auf dem sein sollte nicht zu dunkel. Qualifying the opening 8 of the unpleasant effects of flexion. Esto puede,), al menos en determinadas situaciones (paisaje es importante.

His body is well cared for, the 500D. The big screen is clear, bright and alive. Finally, it offers a reasonable resolution (230,000 pixel 3 "is not necessarily ...).
The treatment appears solid, of course, is not magnesium, but ended as 30D plastic, sturdy.

Frames of 3.4 frames per second and 9 RAWS, or about 170 JPEG images in a row, the burst mode is very useful, but I wish I had situations where the fps is important to cover, but access to my 30D, 5 bids for a second.

Now we have arrived, as was also one of the reasons I bought the 500D. Based on my experience with cameras has been very successful, I had the 500D, as it should.

The quality of the film is very good, I use 720p. I do not need Full HD, especially since only 20 frames per second. One minute of film, eat at least 300MB. The clips here to MOV. En raison du taux élevés de données, il est possible de les compressor assez facilement, sans pertes qualities.
The sound is mono only, unfortunately, included, presumably for marketing reasons. But it is very good and clear.
The autofocus is slow and slow to right pinion drive clearly audible. Manual focus is recommended - with the right of the screen, but not a problem.
In general, I have to keep two things in the light of the film:
- Sometimes there are stripes. This phenomenon has been discussed on the Internet and does not explain all of the sensors is read. There is something wrong, as I expected, but the benefits of high-quality sensor
- This happens in certain situations, the "blind" effect. That's because the CMOS sensor, which is read line by line. Also, in an upright position to prevent fast moving objects on the page.

Regarding the limit of 29:59 minutes, we need an EU regulation on the prevention of potential threats to move the camera with video capture, the camcorder off. If it is a dull place, but honestly, how many times you have a video longer? My previous high was 20 minutes and that was an exception. Because of the high memory requirements of the video that I think what matters is not so bad, except in times of video editing is a simple way to build a cinema on your computer. To cut with clips and more time, what is normal anyway.
At least I can do this as a problem, especially because the battery in any case has a capacity of only about 60 minutes to shoot.

So far I have seen all the advantage of knowing in detail how one can easily verify. While the unit does not offer this to you, but it is possible, but there are cards with a broader objective, which connects the manual. My experience with the old M42 lenses have been very interesting. DOF is controlled by regular cameras with sensors smaller (1 / 6 "or 1 / 4, 5) appears.

Overall I'm very happy with the 500D. There are few things that worry me. These are, first, small problems, including video, on the other hand, I feel upset that the video mode on the dial at the back so I ended up as users of semi - automatic (open / hour) of the wheel must turn, almost always have access. A direct integration would be desirable, as is the ability to absorb the shutter button and start the Live View button (if you're not careful, then the video begins with a forward ...). To this end I Fotofuktion in video mode, meaning any longer because we have neither the time nor the control and the opening for the insertion of a short film can be excused, "was Blackout. Also, some absurd values chosen for 'Adaptation and f/16 Himma a shutter speed of 1 / 50 seconds. Unfavorable for moving subjects ...

My conclusion:
The 500D is almost egg "Wollmilchsau, this time with one or other restrictions, the division into more real models from Canon, but I must say that this is the first" point "of the Canon EOS, the m 'very happy. The grip 400D me so bad, it could inspire the 450D does not. The 500D is a good camera and camcorder with the ability to change, a goal - and this is for me.
With the image quality was relatively slow and small problems that the deduction of a star, but a recommendation from the device!

PS
In the film, at least, has a problem with the artifacts. Used after the last visual style is also used for movies, you can come with too fixated on the border, said the artifacts. We recommend that you wait for the inclusion of a painting, using the sharpness to 0.


www.digitalslrcameraprices.com

read more “Canon EOS 500D Digital SLR Camera (15 megapixels, LiveView, HD video) BODY”
share on: facebook

digital slr body D40 ideal for finding non-amateur digital SLR switch --

There have been some Sony digital cameras, and I've always had good things to your friends and family. Light cheapest digital conducted whenever necessary, and my Sony is the last bag of truth. But I was often disappointed by the image. And the cameras cameras, frankly, Sony (digital video), often broke earlier than expected.

So I bought the D40, because the name of Nikon, and relatively good reviews to post the Amazon and elsewhere. I realize that there are only 6 MP, but for the layman is more than enough. (You have a lot of articles saying that the common people and professionals can challenge up to 5 MP 8 MP 13 MP distinction, said that the quality of the camera and lens may be higher.)

The Nikon is not at all disappointed. I am pleased with the photos, and I am really overwhelmed to 300-400 pictures (half or more with flash) on a single battery charge. I mainly use the automatic configuration of the camera, but I hope to experiment with different configurations available to the user. I also bought 55-200 zoom lens - was only $ 180.

I am a bit 'of photography, when I was younger, then it is just a pain, the film processed. I have all my old Nikon equipment for many years. It appears I needed to take photos of their grandchildren, so I sold all my film and bought the Nikon D40. Wow, I must confess that I am, I am what this camera does not feel overwhelmed. It 'simple' point and shoot ", but that's not why I bought it. I hope that my team and this device is something out .... If I can learn to control them. This unit is more than my old Nikon F that education is going to take some time.

I'm going to say much more, the optics are well defined. How are my pictures, Nikon, sharp as tacks. (E 'quiet, bright, and all controls are easily accessible, once learned) and what to do with them. The great thing I like about digital photography is the immediate response to the large 2.5-inch LCD screen. Another thing I would like the SLR is the lack of latency, "is the nadir and photographic equipment. I tried some others, but it was not the expression of the grandchildren that I was familiar with my camera. With D40 I'm back in business.

Back in the day, take a 4x5 view camera in the woods. Now my 57 years ago, "said Hey, are you crazy?
The D40 kit with lens and Sigma 10-20 which is a combination for the photographer that someone knockout of the mule.
6.1 megapixel is enough for 13x19 print correctly and if not paid by the way, wireless flash control, why should they?
This is a great camera with a dual purpose. Many professionals are on vacation and clings to his job as a backup.
The camera, I recommend friends who shoot more points and you will, but do not want to mortgage the house for a camera.
$ 600 for a device that works like a D70 (maybe even better) with a good magnifying glass is amazing. NEF cuts are perfect for 90% of photography is going on there.

Many critics argue that the Nikon D40 camera designed for first time buyers of digital SLRs. I fall into this category ... Exactly! I have had several digital cameras, including the development of high-end Canon Power Shot. After a while 'I felt that was not entirely satisfied with point and shoot. I am particularly concerned about the problems with red eyes and the camera work relatively poor, despite its high price. But I was not willing to spend money on an expensive digital SLR bdoy camera.

The moment I heard the D40 first availability on the market, I knew I wanted to wait until you get one. The price is right. Now, after months of holding the camera, I'd say it's a godsend. I am very happy with the camera. It feels good in hand and the lens is excellent. The camera quality is immediately apparent.

The first images I took with the camera was in auto mode, which differs only by a point and shoot camera to shoot. The results were much higher. No red eyes, either! Beautiful views and close-ups, even the flowers in bold. Of course, these photos do not meet the standards of a true professional photographer, but it was very gratifying for me. I also knew that the camera can take pictures later became.

The D40 has forced me to learn more about digital photography and photo editing on a PC. The ergonomics of the camera makes it relatively easy to discover its possibilities. The menus are logically constructed. The competition for innovation in camera is very useful. Here is how the context is different from others and the impact it has on your photos. In the eye of the camera, provided limited photo editing is very nice and a step more advanced editing on a PC.

I am sure that Nikon will be happy to know that I'm thinking of buying another camera lens in a not too distant future is.

www.digitalslrcameraprices.com

read more “digital slr body D40 ideal for finding non-amateur digital SLR switch --”
share on: facebook

DSLR Tips: How to darken your exposures

This technique is still persist, albeit with a DSLR camera in manual mode? For example, you could not just specifically with attitudes that exspose, such as increasing the ISO? Anyones help with this would be appreciated!

If you are in manual mode, you change the aperture or shutter speed to put in pictures
usually one meter in the viewfinder shows the correct exposure, then change your settings, go to the device less. Health




www.slrdigitalrebel.com

read more “DSLR Tips: How to darken your exposures”
share on: facebook

Arctic Butterfly DSLR camera sensor cleaner

www.digitalslacameraprices.com

read more “Arctic Butterfly DSLR camera sensor cleaner”
share on: facebook