I took the Canon EOS 500D just over two weeks, at which time about 800 pictures and movies. Now is the time to draw conclusions.
Until now I have a Canon EOS 30D (and still do! Taken) and an old EOS 20D. Now you have the soft-500D (yes, I like both cameras use one with a wide angle, the other) with a telephoto lens.
The Canon EOS 500D in many respects a great advance in other ways, at least a small improvement.
The picture quality is generally very good, as I expected from a Canon EOS. The noise at ISO 100, it is not practical, even ISO 200 is too eigenlich. At 400 ISO, however, we found a deterioration of image quality, but what makes image editing more Get A Grip. ISO800 is compared with the Canon EOS age of at least the same in terms of noise. This is true even at high ISO values. The 500D offers ISO12800 legendary. ISO6400 is - if not increased much in the picture - the 15MP APS-C chip very well, as he ISO12800 fast, the screen size is very good, sound wise to be so good Get a grip.
After all, it is now possible, the extreme sensitivity of the recording to almost complete darkness. It extends from the light just to name a few. It is recommended that in case of doubt, overexpose anything, because the pressure is on the computer is not recommended because of the noise is very old.
That would surely be more likely to buy the 5D MKII - which, of course, much more expensive.
JPEG images directly from the camera are certainly very useful. To clarify Tonwertpriorität and automatically (Auto Light Optimizer) Nachberarbeitung is not usually necessary. In larger devices, I often brilliant images Füllicht Resort - savings here now. However, it is very relaxing, not previously re-process the images. With a visual acuity of 4-5, the images are very "crunchy".
Of course, you can also use RAW. However, each image with 18-27MB seems book. Here we use a memory card is big enough. RAW offers more flexibility for Nachberarbeitung - but not necessarily for more details.
In direct comparison with the 30D, I must say, however, makes the 500D image quality is far better, at least not in the area of ISO1600. I only see advantages in increased sensitivity and better JPEG images directly from the device (in this case, the 30D is not as good, and RAW) has many advantages.
The advantages of 14 bits, praised the Canon, which I found, even with the 500D. Neither they nor a better position, in those who have shown a greater degree of absorption, as the happy.
For the 500D, you need good lenses. The 18-55mm IS actually responsible for the various steps quite well, but I was a little 'disappointed with the 500D. With 17-40mm long run, however, I had better results. The 70-300mm IS USM cut the 500D excellent.
It was in Betracht gezogen werden sollte: die 15MP APS-C Chip auf dem sein sollte nicht zu dunkel. Qualifying the opening 8 of the unpleasant effects of flexion. Esto puede,), al menos en determinadas situaciones (paisaje es importante.
His body is well cared for, the 500D. The big screen is clear, bright and alive. Finally, it offers a reasonable resolution (230,000 pixel 3 "is not necessarily ...).
The treatment appears solid, of course, is not magnesium, but ended as 30D plastic, sturdy.
Frames of 3.4 frames per second and 9 RAWS, or about 170 JPEG images in a row, the burst mode is very useful, but I wish I had situations where the fps is important to cover, but access to my 30D, 5 bids for a second.
Now we have arrived, as was also one of the reasons I bought the 500D. Based on my experience with cameras has been very successful, I had the 500D, as it should.
The quality of the film is very good, I use 720p. I do not need Full HD, especially since only 20 frames per second. One minute of film, eat at least 300MB. The clips here to MOV. En raison du taux élevés de données, il est possible de les compressor assez facilement, sans pertes qualities.
The sound is mono only, unfortunately, included, presumably for marketing reasons. But it is very good and clear.
The autofocus is slow and slow to right pinion drive clearly audible. Manual focus is recommended - with the right of the screen, but not a problem.
In general, I have to keep two things in the light of the film:
- Sometimes there are stripes. This phenomenon has been discussed on the Internet and does not explain all of the sensors is read. There is something wrong, as I expected, but the benefits of high-quality sensor
- This happens in certain situations, the "blind" effect. That's because the CMOS sensor, which is read line by line. Also, in an upright position to prevent fast moving objects on the page.
Regarding the limit of 29:59 minutes, we need an EU regulation on the prevention of potential threats to move the camera with video capture, the camcorder off. If it is a dull place, but honestly, how many times you have a video longer? My previous high was 20 minutes and that was an exception. Because of the high memory requirements of the video that I think what matters is not so bad, except in times of video editing is a simple way to build a cinema on your computer. To cut with clips and more time, what is normal anyway.
At least I can do this as a problem, especially because the battery in any case has a capacity of only about 60 minutes to shoot.
So far I have seen all the advantage of knowing in detail how one can easily verify. While the unit does not offer this to you, but it is possible, but there are cards with a broader objective, which connects the manual. My experience with the old M42 lenses have been very interesting. DOF is controlled by regular cameras with sensors smaller (1 / 6 "or 1 / 4, 5) appears.
Overall I'm very happy with the 500D. There are few things that worry me. These are, first, small problems, including video, on the other hand, I feel upset that the video mode on the dial at the back so I ended up as users of semi - automatic (open / hour) of the wheel must turn, almost always have access. A direct integration would be desirable, as is the ability to absorb the shutter button and start the Live View button (if you're not careful, then the video begins with a forward ...). To this end I Fotofuktion in video mode, meaning any longer because we have neither the time nor the control and the opening for the insertion of a short film can be excused, "was Blackout. Also, some absurd values chosen for 'Adaptation and f/16 Himma a shutter speed of 1 / 50 seconds. Unfavorable for moving subjects ...
My conclusion:
The 500D is almost egg "Wollmilchsau, this time with one or other restrictions, the division into more real models from Canon, but I must say that this is the first" point "of the Canon EOS, the m 'very happy. The grip 400D me so bad, it could inspire the 450D does not. The 500D is a good camera and camcorder with the ability to change, a goal - and this is for me.
With the image quality was relatively slow and small problems that the deduction of a star, but a recommendation from the device!
PS
In the film, at least, has a problem with the artifacts. Used after the last visual style is also used for movies, you can come with too fixated on the border, said the artifacts. We recommend that you wait for the inclusion of a painting, using the sharpness to 0.
www.digitalslrcameraprices.com
share on: facebook
0 comments:
Post a Comment